Black Rednecks & White Liberals

Black Rednecks & White Liberals

  • Downloads:5786
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-10-09 08:53:40
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Thomas Sowell
  • ISBN:1594031436
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

This explosive new book challenges many of the long-prevailing assumptions about blacks, about Jews, about Germans, about slavery, and about education。 Plainly written, powerfully reasoned, and backed with a startling array of documented facts, Black Rednecks and White Liberals takes on not only the trendy intellectuals of our times but also such historic interpreters of American life as Alexis de Tocqueville and Frederick Law Olmsted。 In a series of long essays, this book presents an in-depth look at key beliefs behind many mistaken and dangerous actions, policies, and trends。 It presents eye-opening insights into the historical development of the ghetto culture that is today wrongly seen as a unique black identity--a culture cheered on toward self-destruction by white liberals who consider themselves "friends" of blacks。 An essay titled "The Real History of Slavery" presents a jolting re-examination of that tragic institution and the narrow and distorted way it is too often seen today。 The reasons for the venomous hatred of Jews, and of other groups like them in countries around the world, are explored in an essay that asks, "Are Jews Generic?" Misconceptions of German history in general, and of the Nazi era in particular, are also re-examined。 So too are the inspiring achievements and painful tragedies of black education in the United States。 "Black Rednecks and White Liberals" is the capstone of decades of outstanding research and writing on racial and cultural issues by Thomas Sowell。

Download

Reviews

Julie D。

MUST READ! This could not be more relevant。

Tricia

I went back and forth between 2 and 3 stars for this。 At times I thought the author brought up some good points and a different perspective, but at other times I found it very hard to embrace the point he was trying to make。 He would make a point, but just explain it in a very small context which, in my opinion, didn't truly take the whole picture into account。 And at times I just found it boring。 However I decided to give it 3 stars because it did make me re-examine some of the things I had bee I went back and forth between 2 and 3 stars for this。 At times I thought the author brought up some good points and a different perspective, but at other times I found it very hard to embrace the point he was trying to make。 He would make a point, but just explain it in a very small context which, in my opinion, didn't truly take the whole picture into account。 And at times I just found it boring。 However I decided to give it 3 stars because it did make me re-examine some of the things I had beeen taught and believed。 This allowed me to decide how I would interpret things myself。 。。。more

isaac morales

I read this with a book club and although there was certainly a lot said, the author took far too long to get to his point。 I kept waiting for a counter argument to be disproven, but he simply ignored other takes。 I’m always a bit hesitant going into a book that says oppressed people have a victimhood mindset and presents no solution, but this one could’ve been worse! I agree history shouldn’t be ignored and that the environment you’re raised in can negatively affect you。 I also think he brought I read this with a book club and although there was certainly a lot said, the author took far too long to get to his point。 I kept waiting for a counter argument to be disproven, but he simply ignored other takes。 I’m always a bit hesitant going into a book that says oppressed people have a victimhood mindset and presents no solution, but this one could’ve been worse! I agree history shouldn’t be ignored and that the environment you’re raised in can negatively affect you。 I also think he brought up a good point that you can’t look at history with a modern lens, but I think learning from history requires a comparison of times。 Moreover, there were definitely points that felt a lot like he was trying to defend the systems that have marginalized several communities in America。 I’m sure Sowell is a great economist but the sociological topics discussed in this book required more nuance and experience。 。。。more

Pastor Greg

If I were King, I would make this man's books required reading for anyone to receive their diploma。 I have urged everyone I know to read his writings。 And having read this one, I would encourage anyone who hasn't read his writings to make this book the first。It is so sad to see what the Liberal-Leftist Democrats (spare me the attempt to claim there is any difference beyond that of degree of Marxism) and Progressive RINO/Neo-Cons (a Globalist traitor by any other name) are doing to our nation (U。 If I were King, I would make this man's books required reading for anyone to receive their diploma。 I have urged everyone I know to read his writings。 And having read this one, I would encourage anyone who hasn't read his writings to make this book the first。It is so sad to see what the Liberal-Leftist Democrats (spare me the attempt to claim there is any difference beyond that of degree of Marxism) and Progressive RINO/Neo-Cons (a Globalist traitor by any other name) are doing to our nation (U。S。)。 And especially sad to know that if the principles found in the writings of Thomas Sowell were followed, America wouldn't be turning into a Hell hole police state as it is, today。Learn about our founding principles and what it means to enjoy freedom and liberty for all。 Read this one carefully。 。。。more

Florence

A bunch of elegantly written confirmation bias

Rick Davis

Thomas Sowell is a brilliant and important thinker。 As a collection of essays, it's hard to rate this book as a whole, so I rated each chapter and took the average。 The last two essays are fantastic。Black Rednecks and White Liberals *** (I think Sowell's thesis is mostly correct here, but his reasoning is too broad to make his case well。)Are Jews Generic? ****The Real History of Slavery ****Germans and History ****Black Education: Achievements, Myths, and Tragedies *****History versus Visions ** Thomas Sowell is a brilliant and important thinker。 As a collection of essays, it's hard to rate this book as a whole, so I rated each chapter and took the average。 The last two essays are fantastic。Black Rednecks and White Liberals *** (I think Sowell's thesis is mostly correct here, but his reasoning is too broad to make his case well。)Are Jews Generic? ****The Real History of Slavery ****Germans and History ****Black Education: Achievements, Myths, and Tragedies *****History versus Visions ***** 。。。more

Aster Papazyan

I bought this book for thoughts and views on "middle-men minorities" (Jews, Armenians, Lebanese … etc) and "segregated schools”。 Author approaches every topic with a balanced perspective。 Sowell’s approach to black school's and western slavery is eye opening and his thoughts on German culture are especially rewarding。 The fact that he is afro-american, gives him a certain level of freedom in his criticism of black culture that makes this book special 😎 My PERSONAL recommendation is following: if I bought this book for thoughts and views on "middle-men minorities" (Jews, Armenians, Lebanese … etc) and "segregated schools”。 Author approaches every topic with a balanced perspective。 Sowell’s approach to black school's and western slavery is eye opening and his thoughts on German culture are especially rewarding。 The fact that he is afro-american, gives him a certain level of freedom in his criticism of black culture that makes this book special 😎 My PERSONAL recommendation is following: if you read more than 50 books a year, this book should be one of them 👍 。。。more

Daniel Montague

Flipping through the Metro section of a newspaper I was always intrigued to see the editorials。 Was it going to be a local one on some boring half-wit politician? A George Will peon to some obscure baseball player or screed against FDR? A moderate liberal like Walter Williams or Eugene Robinson? An incendiary liberal such as Molly Ivins? Perhaps a xenophobic rant from Michelle Malkin or Anne Coulter? Oftentimes, it was an economic lesson from Thomas Sowell。 Admittedly, I was not a huge fan of hi Flipping through the Metro section of a newspaper I was always intrigued to see the editorials。 Was it going to be a local one on some boring half-wit politician? A George Will peon to some obscure baseball player or screed against FDR? A moderate liberal like Walter Williams or Eugene Robinson? An incendiary liberal such as Molly Ivins? Perhaps a xenophobic rant from Michelle Malkin or Anne Coulter? Oftentimes, it was an economic lesson from Thomas Sowell。 Admittedly, I was not a huge fan of his in my youth and this book has not changed my mind。 This book is heavily researched and full of interesting tidbits but also incurs straw man and biased information。 There is also a buttload of repetition that felt unnecessary。 The opening chapters provided the most compelling and interesting views。 His idea that the culture in the South exemplified by the Scotch-Irish immigrants that populated this region contributed not only to the white inhabitants but the slaves and later on freeman is fascinating。 Whereas the North, especially the Northeast valued education and a strong work ethic, the South favored a culture on self-reliance and machismo。 This machismo was personified in the act of dueling。 This "culture of honor" trickled down even into the economic sphere where a bad season could cripple even a strong plantation。 Even after the Civil War, this style of governance pervaded as the future (even the next growing season) was often ignored for immediate gratification。 Sowell argues that Blacks in the South were inculcated to this culture and thus were prone to exhibit all of its limitations economically and socially。 He states that as opposed to Blacks in the North who took their social cues from their region those in the South were at a distinct disadvantage。 Of course being held in bondage and all of the ills that it afforded played a huge road。 He often compares the idleness of the South with the industriousness of the North。 One interesting tidbit is that according to IQ scores taken during World War I, Blacks in the North scored just as well if not slightly better than whites in the South。 The biggest issue for most political books is the obvious one; before even writing the first page they have a confirmation bias。 As someone who was a mouthpiece of conservative institutions and foundations, Sowell seems indebted to a certain thinking。 Whether his inane critique of slavery or his steadfast support of Greco-Roman thought, Sowell can come across as not very independent。 To his credit, Sowell is very didactic in his approach。 He has a style that is easy to follow and seems sensible on the surface but I feel if you dug further you could refute a number of his arguments。 As it was an audiobook, I must plead an ignorance in some cases。 He tries to draw a line from the counterculture revolution and the Civil Rights Movement to the erosion of the Black family and higher rates of single parent homes but he neglects to show how white families also changed。 He tries to take on public schools by cherry picking schools in urban areas that have bucked more modern teaching styles in favor of a more "old-school" approach。 It feels like someone else could find anecdotal evidence to prove the opposite point。 Thomas Sowell, was a very respected columnist who despite my frequent disagreements I appreciate more and more。 Even at the age of 91, I am confident he is more lucid and intelligent than most of the dreck on cable news。 This book was full of observations, some more profound than others。 I enjoyed the opening chapters but as the book progressed it felt like it lost steam。 Ultimately, I do not know if would recommend this book but I certainly wouldn't disavow it either。 。。。more

Sean Reid

Interesting perspective but not sure how I feel about it。。。。。 I've heard Dr。 Sowell lecture before and it felt strangely political and more motivated to counter popular ideas。 Which is a good thing I guess? Interesting perspective but not sure how I feel about it。。。。。 I've heard Dr。 Sowell lecture before and it felt strangely political and more motivated to counter popular ideas。 Which is a good thing I guess? 。。。more

Greg Pendleton

So let me start off saying I disagree with Sowell on a lot of his views。 This was a good read for me as a person with a differing viewpoints。 It is well written and well argued and his historic references were thought provoking even though I am in no position to peer review the accuracy。 In fact, I would love to see a rebuttal on a lot of his and counterpoints to a lot of these arguments。Overall this book makes you think and question a lot of your pre-existing positions on these subjects and is So let me start off saying I disagree with Sowell on a lot of his views。 This was a good read for me as a person with a differing viewpoints。 It is well written and well argued and his historic references were thought provoking even though I am in no position to peer review the accuracy。 In fact, I would love to see a rebuttal on a lot of his and counterpoints to a lot of these arguments。Overall this book makes you think and question a lot of your pre-existing positions on these subjects and is probably necessary more than ever as we gravitate to our respective corners and begin to call people out based more on our own wokeness than actual fact or reasoned debate on the subjects。All this being said, I really need a good fiction after this book。 。。。more

Kathleen

This is a fantastic history lesson that explains so much of the cultural differences we see and experience in the world, especially in the USA。 Highly recommend you all read it。 You'll enjoy Thomas Sowell's research and approach to what's true, what's real。 This is a fantastic history lesson that explains so much of the cultural differences we see and experience in the world, especially in the USA。 Highly recommend you all read it。 You'll enjoy Thomas Sowell's research and approach to what's true, what's real。 。。。more

Mike

Some really interesting historical info I had never come across in school, plus nuanced empirical discussions of contentious issues。

Matt Halvorson

Overall he does a great job explaining his point of view and theories。 He does ignore a few counterpoints but he clearly points out examples of how groups have overcome hardships。 He goes on to explain how we can look at history and use those lesson to solve the problems we have today。

Andrew

Fascinating。 I really appreciate Sowell's methodical insistence on reviewing, comparing, and analyzing the data behind certain prevailing narratives。 While each of the essays was insightful in its own way, common themes woven throughout, such as the use and misuse of history, importance of culture, and need to look at facts before telling a narrative are particularly instructive in the current political and social climate to today。 This should be required reading。 Fascinating。 I really appreciate Sowell's methodical insistence on reviewing, comparing, and analyzing the data behind certain prevailing narratives。 While each of the essays was insightful in its own way, common themes woven throughout, such as the use and misuse of history, importance of culture, and need to look at facts before telling a narrative are particularly instructive in the current political and social climate to today。 This should be required reading。 。。。more

Melissa

Outstanding。 Everyone should read this。 Sowell is a national treasure。

Liz

DNF

Tyler B

I got halfway through this book and decided to revisit it at a later time。 After reading Hillbilly Elegy, I’m really interested to learn more about classism and race in America and their correlation。 While I found this book interesting, it’s a lot to digest, and an audiobook was not the proper format。 I need to hold this and be able to reference resources and look at certain sections at different times。My current takeaways are that poor white Southerners were classless, culture less and reckless I got halfway through this book and decided to revisit it at a later time。 After reading Hillbilly Elegy, I’m really interested to learn more about classism and race in America and their correlation。 While I found this book interesting, it’s a lot to digest, and an audiobook was not the proper format。 I need to hold this and be able to reference resources and look at certain sections at different times。My current takeaways are that poor white Southerners were classless, culture less and reckless and their ideologies and behaviors spread throughout the south among other poor people, including newly freed slaves。 It was northerners who, regardless of color, were more productive members of society。 As a southerner myself, this is something I need to explore more and why I’d like to have the book in hand。 I have only been taught about slavery through the American lens, so it was interesting to learn more about its global, centuries-long history。 This book made me even more disgusted by slavery (if that’s even possible), so I don’t understand the other reviewers who said he’s trying to justify it。 He’s merely saying that racism in the U。S。 is a result of slavery and not the cause of it, which truly does make sense given his citation of the many people who have been enslaved by their own countrymen and people of the same color。 I will update my review when I’ve read the whole book and some opposing viewpoints as well。 。。。more

kohl

As somebody living in Europe and not as familiar with the US history as I'd like, I greatly appreciate the effort Sowell's put into Black Rednecks and White Liberals。 There are hundreds of references that one can easily check, which is something I consider of utmost importance when tackling sociological issues。 It took me quite a lot of time to finish the book, simply because I had to constantly look up so many topics and references。The author takes a partisan stance here and there, but as I sai As somebody living in Europe and not as familiar with the US history as I'd like, I greatly appreciate the effort Sowell's put into Black Rednecks and White Liberals。 There are hundreds of references that one can easily check, which is something I consider of utmost importance when tackling sociological issues。 It took me quite a lot of time to finish the book, simply because I had to constantly look up so many topics and references。The author takes a partisan stance here and there, but as I said, everything is backed by statistics as well as testimonials from those times。My only gripe with this book is the fact that he did not devle deeper as to why the Jews/Armenians/Chinese and other middlemen minorities have such a strong work culture and therefore managed to prosper economically within so many societies。 He surely went to great extent to explain how it happened, but not why。 An insight into gypsy culture would've also been an interesting topic to cover。 。。。more

Jared

This was an interesting perspective on racism from a black individual。 It was from an academic viewpoint rather than an emotional one。 I found it a little boring at times。

Forrest

We live in a time when racism has made a huge resurgence throughout the United States。 After the decline of the Jim Crow era we've seen racism slowly die and become practically non-existent throughout the 80's, 90's and early 200s's except for among a few small groups of both black and white people。 Unfortunately, racism has once again exploded; however, this time it is being promulgated by the political left, the self-appointed "defenders" of minorities who are seemingly purposefully fomenting We live in a time when racism has made a huge resurgence throughout the United States。 After the decline of the Jim Crow era we've seen racism slowly die and become practically non-existent throughout the 80's, 90's and early 200s's except for among a few small groups of both black and white people。 Unfortunately, racism has once again exploded; however, this time it is being promulgated by the political left, the self-appointed "defenders" of minorities who are seemingly purposefully fomenting racial hatred and division by propagating false notions of victim-hood and racial disparities。 Thomas Sowell debunks many of the lies and misconceptions regarding racism and slavery being spread throughout modern society and poisoning western education。This book is rich in history and provides insight into the world's racial and ethnic minorities, their migrations and subjugation and insight into U。S。 history and how it compares on a global and historical scale。 A few noteworthy quotes made by the author。 "What blacks can do for themselves has not only been of lesser interest, much of what blacks, in fact, have already done for themselves has been overshadowed by liberal attempts to get them special dispensations。 Whether affirmative action, reparations for slavery, or other race-based benefits, even when the net effect of these dispensations has been much less than the effects of black's own self advancement。""Clearly, the ability to score ideological points against American society or western civilization or to induce guilt and thereby extract benefits from the white population today, are greatly enhanced by making enslavement appear to be a peculiarly "American" or a peculiarly "white" crime。""Conquest, like slavery, existed on every inhabited continent and involved all the races of mankind as both conquerors and subjugated peoples。""When facts about racial or ethnic groups that are both known and relevant are deliberately suppressed because they would undermine a particular vision, doctrine, or agenda, then history is prostituted and cannot serve as a check against visions, because facts have been subordinated to visions。" 。。。more

Catherine Jevic

I listened to this as part of my 'other side of the spectrum' personal discovery mission。I hated nearly every second of this text。Other one star reviews have the 'why this book is terrible' pretty well nailed down。 I listened to this as part of my 'other side of the spectrum' personal discovery mission。I hated nearly every second of this text。Other one star reviews have the 'why this book is terrible' pretty well nailed down。 。。。more

Lydia Watters

This book should be required reading for high school students。

Abbie | nerdyabbie

Thomas Sowell + any bipartisan bullcrap not rooted in facts: Thomas Sowell + any bipartisan bullcrap not rooted in facts: 。。。more

Logan Howard

I was so surprised to see the book was written almost 16 years ago。 Surprising perspective to today。

Athena Davis

Ahistorical trash

Austin O'Connell

In his book, Black Rednecks and White Liberals Thomas Sowell argues that Redneck culture in the American South and black parts of Northern cities has had strongly negative consequences because of its normalization of laziness, violence, risky behavior, and emotionally based decision making。 Sowell documents how the word Redneck originated in England referring to the culture that mainly emerged in the northern borderlands containing the disputed territory between Britain and England。 Redneck cult In his book, Black Rednecks and White Liberals Thomas Sowell argues that Redneck culture in the American South and black parts of Northern cities has had strongly negative consequences because of its normalization of laziness, violence, risky behavior, and emotionally based decision making。 Sowell documents how the word Redneck originated in England referring to the culture that mainly emerged in the northern borderlands containing the disputed territory between Britain and England。 Redneck culture was also present in Ulster county Ireland, and the Scottish highlands which were similarly not under firm British control。 About ¾ of the English immigrants going to the American South usually came from the aforementioned regions in England resulting in the development of Redneck culture in America。 Redneck culture also developed in Northern and Midwestern cities with a large-scale migration of blacks out of the South during the 20th century。Centuries of violence in northern borderlands led to the clans of the borderlands developed a culture with a high tolerance for violence and demonstrations of strength, and put a low emphasis on business creation or intellectual enrichment。 For example, fights in the South between two men often involved attempting to crush an opponent's testicles, which was also a fighting tactic in the northern borderlands。 This type of barbaric fighting in the South usually arose out of relatively minor acts, that were viewed as slights to someone's honor。 As in the borderlands, courts did almost nothing to prevent or punish people for fighting, and crowds usually encouraged violence。 Unfortunately, the high energy of Rednecks was almost entirely devoted to fighting, and not to more productive activities。 Southern farmers worked significantly less than their Northern counterparts。 Despite having 40% of America's dairy cows in 1860, the South produced just 20% of the country's cheese and just 1% of its butter。 One reason for the South's inability to produce dairy is because unlike other groups like German farmers in Wisconsin, Southern Rednecks (like their ancestors in the borderlands) did not build fences for their cattle, which allowed them to roam freely in the winter resulting in cattle to return in the spring half-starved。 Similarly, despite having a favorable climate for the development of a wine industry, the only ⅕ of the wine in the United States was made in the South in 1849。 Southerners were also unindustrious in other industries。 Rednecks living near Tuscaloosa Alabama, for example, ignored the abundance of coal and marble in the region and bought coal from Philadelphia and marble from Italy。While it is tempting to blame the deficiencies of Southern culture on the poverty of the borderlands immigrants when they came to America, Sowell writes about groups with strong cultures that have done well despite their initially disadvantaged circumstances。 For example, in 1908 the lower east side which had the highest concentration of Jews of anywhere in the country was one of the poorest neighborhoods in New York with half of its families living in apartments with three to four people per room, and a quarter of families sleeping five or more to a room。 Today the lower east side of Manhattan is one of the richest parts of the country with the median cost of a home being over 900,000。 Jews in Manhattan initially worked in tightly packed garment factories but were eventually able to economically advance through taking jobs that natives were too proud to take。 This pattern of development never happened in the South because Southerners were often too proud to do more than the bare minimum amount of work required to survive。 Jews also worked in the garment industry in medieval Spain, the Ottoman empire, and Argentina, and experienced similarly high rates of upward social mobility。 Like the Jews, immigrants from Japan, Germany, and China, also experienced similar patterns of coming to America and other countries poor and then becoming richer than natives of a country through high levels of hard work and entrepreneurship。Redneck culture also developed amongst blacks who migrated to Northern cities in the 20th century。 A study of the racial composition of New York State's Sing Sing prison in the 1930s found that blacks were overrepresented by several folds over their share of New York's population。 While in our modern era it is knee jerk reaction to blame any disparity between racial groups on racism, black West Indian immigrants were underrepresented relative to their share of the population, suggesting that culture, not racism was and still is responsible for the disproportionately high number of blacks in prison。 A similar trend in New York can be observed of black business ownership。 During the 1920s the majority of black businesses in Harlem were owned by blacks from the Caribbean, despite the fact that blacks from the South made up a majority of Harlem's population。 Like black immigrants, native-born blacks educated by New Englanders showed a similar divergence from Redneck culture。 English immigrants who immigrated to the North came from mainland Britain that was firmly under control, and were, therefore, more peaceful and wealthy than areas under disputed control。 Immigrants from mainland Britain developed a culture that promotes hard work, education, and rational decision-making。 New Englanders tried to spread their culture to disadvantaged blacks by working in historically black schools as teachers and principles。 One such school was Dunbar High School in DC。 Which ⅓ of black youngsters in DC attended in 1948。 The makeup of Dunbar High school was pretty typical of a typical black school with most students' parents being working class, but the achievements of Dunbar graduates were extraordinary。 Dunbar outperformed schools with students with much wealthier backgrounds; Dunbar did better on standardized tests than 2 of the 3 white schools in DC and the national average。 From 1870 to 1955, most of Dunbar’s graduates went on to higher education。 Since most Dunbar graduates were low income they usually did not go to prestigious colleges, but Dunbar's reputation was renowned even amongst Ivy League schools, at one point in time, Harvard and Dartmouth did not require students from Dunbar to take entrance exams。 Unfortunately, Dunbar's success was relatively short-lived。 As Sowell writes,” The landmark racial desegregation case Brown v Board of Education initially led to strong resistance to school desegregation in many white communities, including that in Washington D。C。 Ultimately a political compromise was worked out in the District of Columbia: In order to comply with the Supreme Court decision, without having a massive shift of students, the D。C school officials decided to turn all public schools into neighborhood schools。 By this time, the neighborhood around Dunbar High School was rundown…[resulting in a change in the character of the school's students and teaching staff]。” Because of these changes, a higher percentage of Dunbar students went on to college during the depths of the Great Depression in the 1930s, than did in 1993。 This is probably the most insightful book I have read about race and culture。 Sowell makes the taboo argument that a group's culture plays a bigger role in their success than external factors, with an abundant amount of historical and factual evidence。 。。。more

Arttu Malek

One of the best books I've ever read on identity and meaning of group differences。 It is built as a series of essays on various ethnic groups ranging from Jews and other middleman minorities to Germans but mainly focuses on African-American population in USA。 It admits racist policies applied by US government and racist views that Americans held in the past, but shows in a meticulous manner that there are many more other factors that bring the group successes of this group down。 It touches thing One of the best books I've ever read on identity and meaning of group differences。 It is built as a series of essays on various ethnic groups ranging from Jews and other middleman minorities to Germans but mainly focuses on African-American population in USA。 It admits racist policies applied by US government and racist views that Americans held in the past, but shows in a meticulous manner that there are many more other factors that bring the group successes of this group down。 It touches things like group culture of carelessness, absence of long-term thinking and proper drive for self-education that Blacks derived from slave owners that they were oppressed by in the south, failure of educational policies' reform, affirmative action and welfare state that set back this minority and froze its ills in time instead of lifting it up。 The contrast between the different societies where slavery existed, analysis of West and anti-Western sentiments amongst Western intellectuals, comparison of Blacks with other minorities and with other types of minorities throughout history, all these themes highlight greatly the trying fate African-Americans had in USA both due to the people who enslaved them and deemed them inferior, cutting down their opportunities and due to the all-caring and guilty-minded liberals who did much harm trying to right the wrongs in an unproductive and patronising way, putting feelings before the facts and explaining any disparity by the atrocities of the West and racism which is, even though easy, does not help to solve the underlying problem。 。。。more

Bradley Endsor

What a book! Thomas Sowell shows how often modern visions distort reality and in fact that so much of the fashionable views on society by those who who have agendas to push are actually false。 He demonstrates the importance of not imposing 21st century eyes on past events。 I highly reccomend everyone reading this as it enables the reader nit to fall into one stage thinking。

Chelsea Shurmantine

Yes this book is infuriating。 For anyone who thinks critically。 FULL cover-to-cover with fallacies。 He cherry picks, but also leaves out all context for quotations。 He used a quote from Dubois about blacks caring more about entertainments than about bank accounts, completely leaving out the context that the statement was said while talking about how black people weren’t allowed to open bank accounts, and that’s why black banks are necessary!!!! Context matters。 This book has some nuggets of fun Yes this book is infuriating。 For anyone who thinks critically。 FULL cover-to-cover with fallacies。 He cherry picks, but also leaves out all context for quotations。 He used a quote from Dubois about blacks caring more about entertainments than about bank accounts, completely leaving out the context that the statement was said while talking about how black people weren’t allowed to open bank accounts, and that’s why black banks are necessary!!!! Context matters。 This book has some nuggets of fun facts like how the white people that emigrated to the US were going at just the wrong moment before a most interesting turning point in European history, but it’s buried in some really gross opinionated language that I wish was left out。 I powered through it for the self examination and interesting correlations he makes but…。。 I kept in mind that the man is pretty old so what can we expect…。 It’s a fascinating viewpoint from someone born in 1930。 Maybe his words will be taken out of context in 100 years and he’ll know what it feels like。 I also want to say that he is using several fallacies throughout the book that have been used by racist anthropologists forever。 Like he’s basically using eugenicist arguments…。。 but for what? I kept wondering, “what is the point of this book?” He tries to state a thesis that he wishes people would acknowledge that there are other sides to the stereotyped victimized descendent of slaves, and the woke descendants of evil oppressor European Christians。 But… then goes on to blame freed slaves for the north’s social ills and race relations, and dumb white southerners for a crappy lack of economic exploitation of free labor while they were allowed slaves??? I’m not even kidding。 He tries to argue that the whites of the south sucked at farming and using slaves and that the best (i。e。 richest) slave owners were northerners that moved south。 A fascinating look at history when he presents data and numbers about butter and first person accounts of the time, but just… What’s his point? Why not just talk about that instead of being cultural relativistic。 This and his prose is just foul to read through。 He uses “hoodlums” as if that’s an actual group of people。 Like un-ironically。 Again, he’s old。 But yeah。 Would love to read some revamped stuff about these topics without his extremely problematic and opinionated word choice。 。。。more

Infosoph

Interesting book full of arguments。Not all seem to be quite sound。 Some are too anecdotal。